5 More US Nukes to Shut: Is Diablo Next?

A rising tsunami of US nuke shut-downs may soon include California's infamous Diablo Canyon double reactors. But it depends on citizen action, including a statewide petition ( http://www.civilactionnetwork.org/cases.html ).

Five US reactor closures have been announced within the past month. A green regulatory decision on California's environmental standards could push the number to seven.

The focus is now on a critical June 28 state Lands Commission meeting
( http://www.slc.ca.gov/Meetings/Meetings.html ) . Set for Sacramento, the hearing could help make the Golden State totally nuke free, ending the catastrophic radioactive and global warming impacts caused by these failing plants. A public simulcast of the Sacramento meeting is expected to gather a large crowd at the Morro Bay Community Center near the reactor site. The meeting starts at 10 AM, but environmental groups will rally outside the Community Center starting at 9 AM. (Check mothersforpeace.org for more information.)

The three State Lands Commissioners will decide whether to require a legally-mandated Environmental Impact Report under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If ordered, a public scoping process will begin, allowing interested groups and individuals to weigh in on the environmental impacts of operation of two nuclear reactors on a fragile coastline.

In 1969 and 1970 PG&E got state leases for tidewater acreage for Diablo's cooling system. These leases are set to expire in 2018 and 2019. If the State Lands Commission does not renew them, both reactors will be forced to shut down.

Signed in 1970 by then-Governor Ronald Reagan, CEQA requires more extensive Environmental Impact Reports on such leases. Included among the issues to be evaluated are water quality, potential damage to human and other life forms, chemical and radiation releases, impacts on threatened and endangered species, and much more. The Commission will not decide whether Diablo will continue to operate, only whether it will now be required to meet CEQA standards.

Pro-nukers say PG&E is at the brink of shutting Diablo's reactors. They cannot economically compete with renewables or gas and are sustained by an intricate network of subsidies, liability protection and tax breaks. Many believe the cost of new environmental studies and of meeting updated standards would be a death blow. More protestors have been arrested at Diablo than any other American nuke, and the public pressure to finally shut it is intense.

The Commissioners include Gavin Newsom, California's Lieutenant Governor, 2018's leading gubernatorial candidate. Newsom says he sees no long-term future for Diablo (http://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Can-Gavin-Newsom-close-Calif... )

Commissioner Betty Yee, the state Controller, is widely thought to favor the requirement.

State Finance Director Michael Cohen is generally believed to vote as instructed by Governor Jerry Brown. Brown opposed Diablo early in his career, but has recently waffled.

Among other things, Diablo daily dumps some 2.5 billion gallons of super-heated water into the ocean, killing vast quantities of marine life and worsening the global climate crisis. The project's chemical runoff infamously killed millions of abalone years before it operated.

Diablo may soon face regulatory challenges from other state and federal agencies that could (among other things) require cooling towers, at a cost of up to $14 billion. PG&E would then face a fierce public fight over who would pay for them.

Diablo is also surrounded by a dozen earthquake faults. It is half the distance from the San Andreas as was Fukushima from the shock that destroyed it. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's former Resident Inspector Dr. Michael Peck has warned Diablo might not survive a similar quake. Such a disaster would irradiate the Central Valley, which supplies much of the US with its fruits, nuts and vegetables. It would send radioactive clouds into Los Angeles within about five hours, and across virtually the entire continental United States.

Closing Diablo would make California entirely nuke-free. Grassroots activists, with help from US Sen. Barbara Boxer and Friends of the Earth, recently shut two big reactors at San Onofre, between LA and San Diego. They also closed plants at Rancho Seco (near Sacramento) and Humboldt Bay, and stopped proposed projects at Bodega and Bakersfield.

Along with most nukes around the world, the only other remaining west coast reactor, WPPS2 on Washington's Hanford military reservation, is also losing massive amounts of money.

Because they can't evenly compete with renewable energy or gas, a tsunami of shut-downs has swept away a dozen US reactors since October, 2012. Dozens more teeter at the brink, including two at Indian Point ( https://closeindianpoint.wordpress.com/2016/02/01/ny-department-of-state... ), just north of Manhattan, and Ohio's rapidly crumbling Davis-Besse reactor near Toledo ( http://nuclear-economics.com/13-davis-besse/ ).

In Japan, more than forty reactors remain shut despite intense government pressure to reopen them in the wake of the Fukushima catastrophe. Germany's energiewende conversion to 100% renewables, which aims to shut all its reactors by 2022, is ahead of schedule and under budget. Much of the rest of Europe (including France) is now moving that way.

Should California follow suit at Diablo, its conversion to a wholly green-powered economy would accelerate, likely leading Los Angeles to become the world's first Solartopian megalopolis.

Ironically, with citizen action, a big push in that direction could now come from a state commission's decision to enforce environmental protections signed into law by California's most pro-nuke governor.